科學教育研究所: 課程參考書目

授課老師：吳心楷

1.  Lave, J. &  Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning : legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge [England] ; New York : Cambridge University Press.
2. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking : cognitive development in social context. New York ; Oxford : Oxford University Press.
3. Vygotskii, L. S. & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
4. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice : learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York, N.Y. : Cambridge University Press.
5. Glaser, R. & Resnick, L. B. (1989). Knowing, learning, and instruction : essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, N.J. : L. Erlbaum Associates.

授課老師：吳心楷、張俊彥、許瑛玿          

1.  Krajcik, J. S. & Czerniak, C. L. (2007). Teaching science in elementary and middle school : a project-based approach. New York : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Committee on Development of an Addendum to the National Science Education Standards on Scientific Inquiry, Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education, National Research Council(2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards : a guide for teaching and learning. Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press.
3. Slotta, J. D. & Linn, M. C. (2009). WISE science : web-based inquiry in the classroom. New York : Teachers College Press.

授課老師：劉湘瑤

1.  傅大為（2009）。回答科學是甚麼的三個答案：STS、性別與科學哲學。臺北市：群學。
2. 史諾（2000）。兩種文化（林志成、劉藍玉譯）。臺北市：貓頭鷹出版。
3. 庫恩（1989）。科學革命的結構（程樹德等譯）。臺北市：遠流。
4. 陳瑞麟（2010）。科學哲學：理論與歷史。臺北市：群學。

授課老師：楊芳瑩

1.  Locke, L. F., Spirduso, W. W., & Silverman, S. J. (2000). Proposals that work : a guide for planning dissertations and grant proposals. Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage.
2. Holmqvist, K. (2011). Eye tracking : a comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

授課老師：楊文金

1.  Banks, D. (2008). The development of scientific writing : linguistic features and historical context. London : Equinox.
2. Crosland, M. (2006). The language of science: from the vernacular to the technical: Lutterworth Press. 
3. Darian, S. G. (2003). Understanding the language of science [electronic resource]. Austin : University of Texas Press.
4. Halliday, M. A. K. & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science : literacy and discursive power. London : Falmer Press.
5. Halliday, M. A. K. & Webster, J. (2004). The language of science. London ; New York : Continuum.
6. Reeves, C. (2005). The language of science: Routledge. 

授課老師：邱美虹

1.  Vosniadou, S. (2008). International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York : Routledge.
2. Hewson (1981): Teaching for conceptual change The status of students’ conceptions

授課老師：楊芳瑩

1.  Phillips, D. C. & Soltis, J. F. (2004). Perspectives on learning. New York : Teachers College Press.
2. Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York : Worth Publishers.

授課老師：劉湘瑤

1.  歐滄和（2002）。教育測驗與評量。臺北市：心理。
2. Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (2000). Assessing science understanding : a human constructivist view. San Diego : Academic Press.

授課老師：顏妙璇

1.  Goswami, U. (1998). Cognition in children. Hove, East Sussex, UK : Psychology Press.
2. Glatzeder, B., Muller, A., & Goel, V. (2010). Towards a theory of thinking [electronic resource] : building blocks for a conceptual framework. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

授課老師：顏妙璇

1.  Boller, F. & Grafman, J. (2000-2003). Handbook of neuropsychology. Amsterdam ; New York : Elsevier.

授課老師：邱美虹

1.  Gilbert, J. & Boulter, C. J. (2000). Developing models in science education. Dordrecht ; Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Gilbert, J. (2007). Visualization in science education. Dordrecht : Springer.
3. Halloun, I. A. (2006). Modeling theory in science education. Dordrecht : Springer.

授課老師：楊文金、劉湘瑤

1.  Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy : from purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH : Heinemann.
2. Bauer, H. H. (1992). Scientific literacy and the myth of the scientific method. Urbana : University of Illinois Press.
3. Shamos, M. H. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, N.J. : Rutgers University Press.
4. Snow, C. P. (1993). The two cultures. Cambridge [Eng.] : Cambridge University Press.
5. 赫胥黎（2004）。美麗新世界（孟祥森譯）。[臺北縣中和市]：華谷文化。
6. 王溢嘉（1992）。賽琪小姐體內的魔鬼：科學的人文思考。台北縣中和市：野鵝出版；台北市：吳氏圖書總經銷。
7. 周天瑋（1998）。蘇格拉底與孟子的虛擬對話：建構法治理想國。臺北市：天下遠見出版。
8. 樊洪业（2000）。科学旧踪。南昌市：江西教育。
9. Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life. NY: Teachers College Press. 9780807746349
10. Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
11. Roth, W. M. & Désautels, J. (2002). Science education as/for sociopolitical action. NY: Peter Lang Publishing.

授課老師：張俊彥、顏妙璇​

1. de Jong, T., Sotiriou, S., & Gillet, D. (2014). Innovations in STEM education: The Go-Lab federation of online labs. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 3
2. Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research. Computers & Education, 87, 218-237.
3. de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340, 305-308.
4. Pyatt, K., & Sims, R. (2012). Virtual and physical experimentation in inquiry-based science labs: Attitudes, performance and access. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 133-147
5. Lehtinen, A., & Viiri, J. (2017). Guidance provided by teacher and simulation for inquiry-based learning: A case study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 193-206
6. 邱美虹(2000)。概念改變研究的省思與啟示。科學教育學刊，8(1)，1-34。
7. Novak, J. D. & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them, Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
8. Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169.
9. 林雅姿(2011)。融入討論的雙重情境學習模式對學生血糖恆定概念學習之影響。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學生命科學系，臺北市。
10. White, R. & Gunstone, R. (1992). Prediction-Observation- Explanation. In Probing Understanding (pp.44-64). New York: Routledge.
11. Keogh, B., & Naylor, S. (1999). Concept cartoons, teaching and learning in science: An evaluation. International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 431-446.
12. Ekici, F., Ekici, E., & Aydin, F. (2007). Utility of concept cartoons in diagnosing and overcoming misconceptions related to photosynthesis. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2(4), 111-124.
13. Glynn, S. M. (1991) Explaining science concepts: A teaching- with-analogies model. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany, & B. K. Britton (Eds.). The psychology of learning science (pp. 219-240). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Brown, D. E., & Clement, J. (1989). Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: Abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction. Instructional Science, 18(4), 237-261.
15. Grayson, D. J. (1996). Concept substitution: A strategy for promoting conceptual change. In D. R. Treagust, R. Duit, B. J. Fraser (Eds). Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics (pp. 152-161). New York: Teachers College Press
16. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113-125.

授課老師：張文華、劉湘瑤

1.  Joyce, B. R., Weil, M., & Showers, B. (1992). Models of teaching. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.

授課老師：楊芳瑩

1.  Siegel, D. J. (1999). The developing mind : toward a neurobiology of interpersonal experience. New York : Guilford Press.

授課老師：張俊彥、許瑛玿

1.  Heinich, R. ... [et al.] (2002). Instructional media and technologies for learning. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Merrill/Prentice Hall.

授課老師：林陳涌、劉湘瑤

1.  希斯蒙都（2007）。科學與技術研究導論（林宗德翻譯）。臺北市：群學。
2. 陳恒安（2009）。20世紀後半葉台灣演化學普及知識的思維樣式。臺北市：記憶工程。
3. Bowler, P. J. &  Morus, I. R. (2005). Making modern science : a historical survey. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.

授課老師：譚克平

1.  王文科、王智弘（2008）。教育研究法。臺北市：五南。
2. Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, R. McNally.

授課老師：吳心楷

1.  American Psychological Association (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
2. Benson, M., Benson, E., & Ilson, R. (1999). The BBI dictionary of English word combinations. Taipei : Bookman.
3. 亞倫（2004）。The little, Brown英文寫作必備手冊（洪慧芳譯）。臺北市：臺灣培生教育。
4. 蔡今中（2010）。社會科學研究與論文寫作：成功發表秘笈。臺北市：高等教育出版。
5. 廖柏森（2007）。英文研究論文寫作：文法指引。臺北市：眾文圖書。
6. 廖柏森（2008）。英文研究論文寫作：關鍵句指引。臺北市：眾文圖書。
7. 廖柏森（2008）。英文研究論文寫作：搭配詞指引。臺北市：眾文圖書。

授課老師：譚克平、張立民

1.  Howell, D. C. (2010). Statistical methods for psychology. Belmont, CA : Thomson Wadsworth.
2. Stevens, J. (2010). Intermediate Statistics: A Modern Approach. (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 
3. Hinkle, D. E., Jurs, S. G., & Wiersma, W. (2003). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Boston : Houghton Mifflin : Wadsworth.
4. Howell, D. C. (2007). Statistical methods for psychology. Australia ; Belmont, CA : Thomson/Wadsworth.
5. Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research : explanation and prediction. Forth Worth : Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
6. Stevens, J. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York : Routledge.

授課老師：邱美虹

1.  Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from "Case Study Research in Education." 
2. 陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。臺北市：五南。
3. Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design : an interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.

授課老師：譚克平

1.  Polya, G. (1971). How to solve it : a new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press.
2. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, Fla. : Academic Press.
3. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). Cognitive science and mathematics education. Hillsdale, N.J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.